Kelly Portfolios, Denoising and Hierarchical Risk Parity
Do machine learning techniques improve portfolio construction, or merely complicate it?
- Built a Kelly-optimal portfolio maximising empirical log growth on the realised return distribution rather than a Gaussian approximation, since every asset showed excess kurtosis between 2.4 and 16.3.
- Applied Marchenko-Pastur denoising, hierarchical risk parity and detoning to the covariance matrix, then compared six portfolios against an equal-weight benchmark.
- Validated with five purged, embargoed cross-validation folds rather than a single out-of-sample window, because plain K-fold leaks future information into training on a return series.